}

4 Jul 2012

Steve Hansen should follow the example of Del Bosque and Spain

If Steve Hansen and his fellow All Black coaches ever needed a blueprint on ‘how to sustain international sporting success’, they need look no further than the efforts of Spanish national coach Vicente Del Bosque, the man who inherited their title winning side of 2008 before subsequently leading Spain to unprecedented World Cup and European glory in 2010 and 2012.
By dismantling Italy four goals to nil in the final of European football’s showpiece tournament on Sunday night, ‘La Rojas’ clinched their third successive major title; a record which they hold alone over almost a century of competition. This record is all the more astonishing though, when you consider the raft of early exits, painful defeats and tears shed by both their players and supporters prior to their inaugural success at Euro 2008.
Getting the monkey off the back - All Blacks mirror Spain
In many ways, the pain suffered on the pitch by the Spaniards resembled the strife of the All Blacks from 1991 onwards. Despite enjoying a stranglehold on European club football and despite also offering some of the most technically gifted players on the planet, Spain often flattered to deceive on the world stage.  Raul Gonzalez, Pep Guardiola and Fernando Hierro are just one legendary Spanish triumvirate of the modern era who have nothing to show for their exploits at International level.
At times one could conclude that they simply lacked a touch of luck, but years of repetitive failure had led Spain to question their playing philosophy, their unity and even the fragility of their psyche. Who does that remind you of, pray tell?
The All Blacks like Spain have now overcome their own much publicised 24 years of hurt.  Their absorbing 8-7 victory over France in last year’s Rugby World Cup final was one for the purists and the relief in the air at Eden Park that night was palpable. The foundations for that victory were laid by Graham Henry and his assistants over the preceding eight years though and judging by the recent ‘blackwash’ over Ireland, the monkey of past World Cup failure is now well and truly of their back.
A ‘New Breed’ is taking over
At times during the IRB’s flagship international tournament last year, NZ looked like they were weighed down by the enormous weight of four and a half million supporters’ expectations.  Their victory over Australia apart, the knock-out stages produced rugby where it seemed the All Blacks were doing their best not to lose, rather than seizing the moment themselves. Even the selections gave that impression. Opting for Richard Kahui in the 11 shirt over say Hosea Gear or Zac Guildford suggested that defence and negating the opposition rather than exploiting them was the key factor in the selection process.
Sam Cane impressed in June
Now though it seems Hansen and co see an opportunity to evolve the All Blacks’ game. Julian Savea, Aaron Smith, Sam Cane, Beauden Barrett, Brodie Retallick and Luke Romano all made impressive starts to their international careers in the June internationals in arguably the greatest influx of young talent to the side since the John Mitchell era of 2003, where the likes of Mils Muliaina, Joe Rokocoko, Keven Mealamu and Jerry Collins made their debuts.
The first and third test against Ireland in particular gave an insight into the talent which these rookies possess (as well as the coaches’ change in emphasis on attack). Might I add Aaron Cruden to that list of impressive young bucks too, who will surely be the first fly half to seriously challenge for Dan Carter’s crown. Carter remains as composed as ever, as his last minute heroics in the 2nd test displayed so evidently, but Cruden is showing skills in attack which even Southbridge’s most famous son must be a little in awe of. It seems inevitable that Cruden will eventually pair up with his Manawatu team mate Aaron Smith in the long-term for the All Blacks.
The future it seems looks pretty rosy for the All Blacks.
Striking the right balance
Steve Hansen should however take note of the troubles of Pieter De Villiers; the man who took over from Jake White after South Africa were crowned World Champions in 2007. De Villiers promised an ‘evolution’ of the Springboks’ game to much fanfare when he was appointed. He wanted them to move from their defence and kick chase oriented game to philosophy of giving the ball some air and running teams ragged. Apart from one strong year in 2009, he failed....miserably. They ended up reverting to type and stagnating. Put simply, his process of evolution was poorly thought through and badly executed.
Peter DeVilliers efforts a warning
In the quarter-final against the Wallabies in 2012, SA showed an alarming lack of creativity with the ball in hand. Whether Bryce Lawrence played an influential part in their loss is irrelevant. For all their possession, they should have been far more clinical. Would they have fared better under Jake White?
Evolution is possible if done correctly but one has to stay true to the principles which take you to the top of the table too. Play to your strengths and make minor changes along the way. I have faith that this current coaching team can strike the right balance between the two. Whether they can achieve it will be key to their continued success. We be on the verge of an era of dominance for the All Blacks.
If Hansen needs any advice though, he only need give the Marquis Del Bosque a call.

4 comments:

  1. This is not a bad article. The comparison with Spain is understandable. However it would have benefitted from a description of what Del Bosque's strategy was that kept Spain winning. To simply say that Hansen should do same (keep his side winning??!!) really doesn't tell us much.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ Wax.

      The strategy which I thought was outlined was that a balance between evolution (both in playing style and selection) and sticking with the principles which made you successful in the first place is key.

      Every coach wants to make an imprint on the side, but if you try to do too much too soon, it can backfire.

      Where Del Bosque suceeded was that he made minor changes along the way but continued with the short passing and posession style of fottball which helpd them to their inaugral sucess at International level. He then evolved them this tournament by making a slight change and effectively puting in a false striker at the top of the pitch.

      Delete
  2. richard scanlan09 July, 2012

    A little simplistic, As a nzer,I find the obsession with world cups works to the detriment of the sport. Everything is geared towards a six week window every four years,and it would seem results in between the wc are meaningless. That being the case, call them "friendlies" and be done with it.Nz supporters simply would not stand for a series of mediocre results all in the name of getting to be officially called world champs-it is about consistently achieving results,its called CONSISTENCY and is what makes the abs the team they are!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Personally I have to disagree with you there Richard.

      Where I think New Zealand have done well is treating every tournament which they are involved in with respect. Consistency is vitally important in NZ and I don't think they are geared up exclusively for World Cups. If they were, how would you explain there Tri Nations victories, Grand Slams and series victory over the Lions a few years ago??

      It is however a criticism which I believe you could aim at other nations. England in particular.

      To maintain consistency in sport you have to look to be able to evolve/ blood new players as you risk stagnating. This is where NZ is particularly good. Introducing young talented players, but not to the extent where the team is bereft of experience.

      Delete